Your Search Results

      • Judaism

        The Jewish National Fund (JNF) and its Role in the Zionist Movement in Palestine (1901: 1948)

        by Ilham Shamaly (Dr.)

        The establishment of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) in 1901 has been a turning point in the history of the Zionist movement. It played a prominent role in serving the Zionist project, as it was the most important Zionist institution and the cornerstone of the Jewish national home project. This study - which is originally a PhD thesis discussed in Modern History major at Ain Shams University - sought to search for the role played by the JNF as a Zionist institution that emerged from the Zionist organization and played an important role in seizing the lands of Palestine from 1901 until 1948. Whereas through the Mandate Government's embrace of the Zionist project, it was able to seize parts of the land of Palestine and establish settlements on it to receive Zionist immigrants from all over the world. The JNF was provided with all the British procedures and legislations that paved the way for establishing the Zionist entity on the land of Palestine. The JNF launched the Zionist activity from the stage of Zionist ideas and visions to the stage of implementation and practical application of the principles that the Zionist movement called for including the occupation of land and work, which was  entirely applied and was the most important foundation that allowed it to tighten its control over the Palestinian land that it seizes. Those principles shown the real face of this usurping entity, which not only took the saying "a land without a people for a people without a land" as a slogan, but also worked to implement it in a racist and blatant manner, violating all religious, historical and legal rights of the Palestinian people in their land to cause a demographic imbalance in favor of the Zionist project. The Zionist propaganda carried out by the JNF among Jewish communities in the world countries had a significant role in allowing it continue its work. Donations, grants and financial loans arrived from Jewish governments, institutions and individuals who played an important role in covering its activities. Hence, Fund committees left no method of Collecting donations unless linked to the Torah to make Jews, wherever they are, donate to the JNF in application to religious beliefs that have been enshrined for some of them. Undoubtedly, the JNF worked to exploit its relations inside the United States to obtain significant financial support. The United States has been the largest donor to the JNF, which means that its role before 1948 was no less than the support that the Zionist project obtained from Britain. The JNF’s job has also been characterized by integration with the rest of the Zionist institutions within the Zionist organization. Zionist competition was to support immigration and settlement, regardless of the deep differences that were sidelined when it came to the common Zionist goal.

      • History: specific events & topics
        October 2019

        Jews in the Ottoman State until the End of the Nineteenth Century

        by Ahmet Hikmet Eroğlu (Prof.), Ahmed Abdullah Negm (Prof.)

        Muslims have never treated Jews in a racial manner and the Ottoman State was not an exception. When Europe had expelled Jews after the establishment of the Inquisition, they had only two options: either Christianization or emigration. The main emigration was to the Ottoman State after their expulsion from Spain in 1492, and from Portugal in 1496. Jews spread throughout the Ottoman State, participated in its practical life, played important roles in trade and handicrafts, and were allowed to apply their religious laws, as rabbis were considering the proceedings that arise among them. However, Jews had a very negative impact on the state’s economy. The inflation that began in the sixteenth century was due to their nipping off bits of coins’ edges, which led to a decrease in soldiers’ purchasing power, causing at times the Janissary and Sipahis mutinies and harming the system of the state and society. This book discusses the Jewish immigration to the Ottoman State, its causes, consequences, and impacts on the Ottoman Palace and society, as well as the social history of Jews under the Ottoman rule.

      • General & world history

        Latin and Islamic Historiography of the Crusades

        A Comparative Study of William of Tyre (1130: 1185) and Ibn al-Athīr (1160: 1232)

        by Mona Jumaa Hammad (Dr.), Mustafa Wajih (Prof.)

        The First Crusade has produced more historical material than did any other event in the early Middle Ages. Because the participants of the Crusade were proud of their work, and their desire to retain a memory of their actions was severe. This book - which is originally a PhD thesis discussed at the University of Pennsylvania - discusses this topic. It consists of two parts: the first focuses on Islamic and Latin historiography and codification of Crusades, presents various types of historical literature for Crusades, and reveals the similarities and differences between Islamic and Christian annuals related to the period. As for the second part, it is a comparative study dealing with the approach of William of Tyre (1130: 1185) and Ibn al-Athīr (1160: 1232) in narrating and analyzing Crusades’ events, and comparing the two approaches in an attempt to understand the nature of relations between the Latin Emirates in the East and the Islamic World in the twelfth century.

      • Political parties

        Experiences of Political Islam in the Corridors of Modern State

        by Group of Researchers

        The study aims to preview the governance experiences of Islamists in the modern era, indicate the extent of their success or failure, and attempt to discover the real fundamentals that assisted their establishment and the real factors that led to their failure. Further, it attempts to reveal their various influences on societies’ systems and how they have been affected by global modernity and the extent of their influence on it. The study also seeks to discover the temporal and spatial contexts for the emergence of the various Islamists’ governance experiences in the modern era and to reliably determine the causes and factors that led to their rise and failure. It moreover seeks to reveal the essence of the practices of modern political, social and institutional experiences of Islamic governance and how close or far they really are from theoretical standards, ideas and perceptions. Furthermore, it attempts to evaluate their institutional performance, know the interactions (containment and collision) between the political perception with religious reference and Western and Arab nationalist perceptions. It finally analyzes the level of interaction of Arab regimes with such experiences in terms of vision, practices, discourse, and the Western position towards them to benefit from the obstacles to success and factors of failure of each experience under consideration at either the regional level or the national level as a whole. Another objective is to use their societal influences and institutional production in building a theoretical framework and a knowledge model that can play its role in developing a vision with social and economic dimensions worthy of application. The most prominent experiences discussed by the project are: Khomeinism in Iran, Erbakan and Justice and Development in Turkey, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Al-Nahda in Tunisia, Al-Turabi in Sudan, House of Saud in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Justice and Development in Morocco, the National Liberation Front in Algeria, the Bolkiah in the Sultanate of Brunei,  Hamas in Palestine, Begovic in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Zia-ul-Haq in Pakistan, the Taliban in Afghanistan, the Islamic Emirate in India, Islamic Courts in Somalia, Tuaregs and Ansar Dine in Mali, and Boko Haram in Nigeria.

      Subscribe to our

      newsletter